\relax 
\citation{ZEUSevent}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}QCD and the hadronic final state}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}Event Shapes}{1}}
\citation{eduardo}
\citation{3jx}
\citation{3jet}
\citation{php}
\citation{himass}
\citation{techni}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.2}Fragmentation in DIS}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.3}Azimuthal Asymmetries}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.4}Jet Production}{2}}
\citation{virtual}
\citation{SaS}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.5}Jet substructure}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.6}Virtual-photon structure}{3}}
\citation{stew}
\citation{prph_ref1}
\citation{prph_ref2}
\bibcite{ZEUSevent}{1}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.7}Strange hadron production}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.8}Inclusive Prompt Photon Photoproduction}{4}}
\bibcite{brookandskillicorn}{2}
\bibcite{eduardo}{3}
\bibcite{3jx}{4}
\bibcite{3jet}{5}
\bibcite{php}{6}
\bibcite{himass}{7}
\bibcite{techni}{8}
\bibcite{virtual}{9}
\bibcite{SaS}{10}
\bibcite{stew}{11}
\bibcite{prph_ref1}{12}
\bibcite{prph_ref2}{13}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  ZEUS preliminary contour plot of two-parameter fits of $\overline {\alpha }_0(\mu _{\scriptscriptstyle I})$ and $\alpha _s(M_Z)$ to mean event shape variables. Two $\sigma $ stat contours for fits both including and excluding the lower $x$ data for $\tau $, $B$, $\tau _C$, $\rho $ and $C$ parameters are indicated. }}{6}}
\newlabel{contour}{{1}{6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary jet cross section versus angle $\phi _{\rm  jet}^B$ in the Breit frame in DIS compared to the DISENT NLO QCD calculation. The shaded area indicates the hadronic energy-scale uncertainty.}}{7}}
\newlabel{fig:incjets}{{2}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary three jet cross sections. Leading-log (LL) Monte Carlo resolved-photon processes are shown by light shading, and LL Monte Carlo direct by dark shading. The ${\cal  O}(\alpha \alpha _s^2)$ tree-level calculation is shown as the curve.}}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:3jet}{{3}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces ZEUS jet cross sections compared to the NLO QCD calculation of Frixione and Ridolfi. The shaded areas for the data the theory prediction indicate the hadronic energy-scale uncertainty and the theoretical uncertainty respectively.}}{9}}
\newlabel{fig:costheta}{{4}{9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces ZEUS jet cross sections compared to the NLO QCD calculation of Frixione and Ridolfi. The shaded areas for the data the theory prediction indicate the hadronic energy-scale uncertainty and the theoretical uncertainty respectively.}}{10}}
\newlabel{fig:xgo}{{5}{10}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Total ZEUS dijet cross-sections for differing $E_T$ cut on the sub-leading jet compared to HERWIG and the NLO QCD calculation of Frixione and Ridolfi. The shaded area indicates the NLO renormalisation scale uncertainty.}}{11}}
\newlabel{fig:et2cut}{{6}{11}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces ZEUS excluded region of cross-section times branching ratio for new heavy resonances, ${\cal  P}$, coupling preferentially to the photon-gluon initial state in the mass region 60$<M_{\cal  P}<$149\nobreakspace  {}GeV.}}{12}}
\newlabel{fig:hiexclude}{{7}{12}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary results on the mean jet shape (left) and mean subjet multiplicity (right) compared to PYTHIA. For PYTHIA, both quark and gluon jets are also shown separately.}}{12}}
\newlabel{fig:struct1}{{8}{12}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary jet cross-sections versus $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators cos}\nolimits \theta ^*$ compared to HERWIG and PYTHIA.}}{13}}
\newlabel{fig:struct2}{{9}{13}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary data on the mean jet-shape compared to ${\cal  O}(\alpha _s^2)$ QCD for different jet transverse energies.}}{13}}
\newlabel{fig:alph1}{{10}{13}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary values of $\alpha _S$ extracted from the jet-shape data.}}{14}}
\newlabel{fig:alph2}{{11}{14}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary cross-sections on $K_S^0$ meson production versus the meson pseudo-rapidity for high transverse energy dijet photoproduction.}}{14}}
\newlabel{fig:kseta}{{12}{14}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces ZEUS preliminary preliminary cross-sections on $\Lambda $ production for high transverse energy dijet photoproduction normalised both to the $\Lambda $ data (solid) and to the $K_S^0$ data (dashed).}}{15}}
\newlabel{fig:lambdaxgo}{{13}{15}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces  ZEUS preliminary dijet cross-sections, triply differential in $Q^2$, mean jet transverse energy squared and $x^{\rm  OBS}_{\gamma }$ compared to HERWIG.}}{16}}
\newlabel{fig:virt1}{{14}{16}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces (a) $E_T$ distribution of prompt photons in ZEUS (left plot), (b) pseudorapidity distribution (right plot).}}{16}}
\newlabel{fig:prph}{{15}{16}}