PBTWiki - User contributions [en]

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T13:04:46Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with DEFAULT JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

A positive q/m is obtained by changing the sign of the bunch charge in witr.py and the sign of Qw (hmmmmmm)

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (MeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 10 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Result as expected, but need to run over greater plasma depth.
|-
|2 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Longer run.
|-
|3 || positron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || 1.0 || 49.976500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 60.038280 || 150 || Identical to electrons which isn't right. Just changing bunch charge sign for next run in case of cancelling effect?
|-
|4 || positron(?) || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || 1.0 || 49.976500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.844681 || 150 || test
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T13:04:25Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with DEFAULT JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

A positive q/m is obtained by changing the sign of the bunch charge in witr.py and the sign of Qw.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (MeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 10 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Result as expected, but need to run over greater plasma depth.
|-
|2 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Longer run.
|-
|3 || positron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || 1.0 || 49.976500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 60.038280 || 150 || Identical to electrons which isn't right. Just changing bunch charge sign for next run in case of cancelling effect?
|-
|4 || positron(?) || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || 1.0 || 49.976500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.844681 || 150 || test
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T12:44:47Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with DEFAULT JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

A positive q/m is obtained by changing the sign of the bunch charge in witr.py and the sign of Qw.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (MeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 10 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Result as expected, but need to run over greater plasma depth.
|-
|2 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Longer run.
|-
|3 || positron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || 1.0 || 49.976500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 60.038280 || 150 || Longer run.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T12:42:44Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with DEFAULT JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

A positive q/m is obtained by changing the sign of the bunch charge in witr.py and the sign of Qw.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (MeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 10 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Result as expected, but need to run over greater plasma depth.
|-
|2 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Longer run.
|-
|3 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 100 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || Longer run.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T12:09:17Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with DEFAULT JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (MeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || electron || base0.cfg (JPF) || 3.84 || 10 || -1.0 || -49.980500 || n/a || n/a || n/a || 59.755747 || 150 || comms
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T11:50:33Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with DEFAULT JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || || || || || || || || || || || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T11:39:59Z

FernPannell:

Electron and Positron beams generated with JPF witr.py beamfile generator, run through lem.py for beam diagnostics, and used with JPF base0.cfg (edited for increased duration and format of outputted results).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || || || || || || || || || || || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T11:37:16Z

FernPannell:

test words

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || || || || || || || || || || || ||
|-
}

test words

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T11:37:04Z

FernPannell:

Plasma Wakefield/DriverStudy

2022-09-29T11:34:17Z

FernPannell: Created page with "{| class="wikitable" !Run Number !Driver Description !Base Configuration !Window Width !Window Length ! q/m !Total Weight (pC) !LCODE ampl !LCODE Beam Current !LCODE Beam Lengt..."

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || || || || || || || || || || || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-29T11:32:07Z

FernPannell: /* LCODE */

AWAKE Simulations

Run summaries of Particle-in-Cell Simulations for PDPWA.

== LCODE ==

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

=== [[/DriverStudy|Electron-Positron Driver Comparison]] ===

== WarpX ==

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-29T11:31:56Z

FernPannell: /* LCODE */

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T08:37:23Z

FernPannell:

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Driver Density: Long vs Short Proton Bunch

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || Proton, short beam, shallow plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Looks like it has a suck in region first. Good providing the next one does not.
|-
|2 || Anti-proton, short beam, shallow plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um || 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Blowout first shown, good.
|-
|3 ||Anti-proton, short beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON.
|-
|4 ||Proton, short beam, deeper plasma|| short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-
|5 ||Proton, longer beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.5 || 18.16um || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-
|6 ||Anti-proton, longer beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.5 || 18.16um || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T08:18:27Z

FernPannell:

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Driver Density: Long vs Short Proton Bunch

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || Proton, short beam, shallow plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Looks like it has a suck in region first. Good providing the next one does not.
|-
|2 || Anti-proton, short beam, shallow plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um || 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Blowout first shown, good.
|-
|3 ||Anti-proton, short beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON.
|-
|4 ||Proton, short beam, deeper plasma|| short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-
|5 ||Proton, longer beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.5 || real length || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-
|6 ||Anti-proton, longer beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.5 || real length || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T08:15:44Z

FernPannell:

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Driver Density: Long vs Short Proton Bunch

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || des || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Looks like it has a suck in region first. Good providing the next one does not.
|-
|2 || des || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um || 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Blowout first shown, good.
|-
|3 ||des|| short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON.
|-
|4 ||des|| short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-
|5 ||des|| short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.5 || real length || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T08:15:12Z

FernPannell:

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Driver Density: Long vs Short Proton Bunch

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Driver Description
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || des || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Looks like it has a suck in region first. Good providing the next one does not.
|-
|2 || des || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um || 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Blowout first shown, good.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.5 || real length || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T05:53:43Z

FernPannell:

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Driver Density: Long vs Short Proton Bunch

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || total weight || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || beam length|| 30 ||
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || 3.6 || 0.1 || beam length || 30 ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T05:44:11Z

FernPannell:

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T05:43:36Z

FernPannell:

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T05:43:07Z

FernPannell:

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-13T05:42:38Z

FernPannell:

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:46:38Z

FernPannell:

AWAKE Simulations

Run summaries of Particle-in-Cell Simulations for PDPWA.

== LCODE ==

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

== WarpX ==

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:46:26Z

FernPannell:

AWAKE Simulations

Run summaries for Particle-in-Cell Simulations for PDPWA.

== LCODE ==

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

== WarpX ==

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:43:59Z

FernPannell: /* September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster */

AWAKE Simulations

Run summaries for LCODE PDPWA simulations.

== LCODE ==

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

== WarpX ==

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:40:19Z

FernPannell: /* September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster */

AWAKE Simulations

Run summaries for LCODE PDPWA simulations.

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:39:26Z

FernPannell: /* Sep-22: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster */

AWAKE Simulations

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|September 2022: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:38:54Z

FernPannell: /* STFC Summer School 2022 Poster */

AWAKE Simulations

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|Sep-22: STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:37:34Z

FernPannell: /* STFC Summer School 2022 Poster */

AWAKE Simulations

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster

2022-09-09T22:37:04Z

FernPannell: Created page with "Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics. (LCODE configuration takes m/q, but re..."

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:36:44Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|STFC Summer School 2022 Poster]] ===

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:35:02Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

=== [[/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster|Poster Simulation 09-09-22]] ===

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/Poster Simulation 09-09-22

2022-09-09T22:34:10Z

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:34:00Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

=== [[/Poster_Simulation_09-09-22|Poster Simulation 09-09-22]] ===

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:33:03Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

=== [[/Poster_Simulation_09-09-22|Poster Simulation 09-09-22]] ===

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:32:23Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

=== [[/FernPannell|Fernsss Pannell]] ===

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield/FernPannell

2022-09-09T22:31:58Z

FernPannell: Created page with "test page"

test page

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T22:31:47Z

FernPannell:

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

=== [[/FernPannell|Fern Pannell]] ===

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T16:45:07Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T16:06:04Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || 1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T16:05:29Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-
|9 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || 2045.504558 || -1 || +3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:58:50Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-
|8 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 ||30 || Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:54:48Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || total weight || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || length ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:54:23Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || total weight || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || length ||30 || Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:50:59Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || -1.0 || total weight || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || length ||30 || Can compare this directly with run 3.
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:50:14Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || -1.0 || total weight || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || length ||30 ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:48:01Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || || || N/A || N/A || || N/A || 12.5 || 170 || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:41:53Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Can compare this directly with run 3. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || || || N/A || N/A || || N/A || 12.5 || 170 || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:33:09Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || || -1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || || 30 || Can compare this directly with run 3.
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || || || N/A || N/A || || N/A || 12.5 || 170 || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:30:56Z

FernPannell:

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6|| 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || N/A || || N/A || 50 || 170 || || Plasma changed from 73440 to 157000 (rubidium).
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || || || N/A || N/A || || N/A || 12.5 || 170 || ||
|-

Plasma Wakefield

2022-09-09T15:30:00Z

FernPannell: /* Poster Simulation 09-09-22 */

AWAKE Simulations

== Poster Simulation 09-09-22 ==

Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.

{| class="wikitable"
!Run Number
!Base Configuration
!Window Width
!Window Length
! q/m
!Total Weight (pC)
!LCODE ampl
!LCODE Beam Current
!LCODE Beam Length
!Beam Length (um)
!Energy (approx) (GeV)
!Comments
|-
|1 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Default DAC short_bunch.cfg
|-
|2 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical.
|-
|3 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Plot x-range increases with window length increase.
|-
|4 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 1.0 || -2045.504558 || 1 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.63 || 30 || Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this.
|-
|5 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || || -2045.504558 || 1 || 0.1 || 3.64 || 30 || Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots.
|-
|6 || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 20 || 0.00054 || N/A || || N/A || 50 || 170 || || Plasma changed from 73440 to 157000 (rubidium).
|-
|7 || short_bunch - DAC || || || N/A || N/A || || N/A || 12.5 || 170 || ||
|-