Proton Calorimetry/Future Work: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SimonJolly (talk | contribs) |
SimonJolly (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Personnel == | |||
* '''UCL''': Simon Jolly ('''SJ'''), Joseph Bateman ('''JB'''), Febian ('''F'''), Matt Warren ('''MW'''), Harry Barnett ('''HB'''). | |||
* '''Bari''' ('''Ba'''): Raffaella Radogna ('''RR'''). | |||
* '''Oxford University''' ('''Ox'''): Pete Hastings ('''PH'''), Mark Jones ('''MJ'''). | |||
* '''Imperial College''' ('''IC'''): Andy Rose ('''AR'''), Duncan Parker ('''DP'''), Munir Saleh ('''MS'''). | |||
* '''Heidelberg''' ('''He'''): Blake Leverington ('''BL'''), Julian Horn ('''JH'''). | |||
== Design Goals == | == Design Goals == | ||
Line 11: | Line 19: | ||
== Current Status (October 2025) == | == Current Status (October 2025) == | ||
* QuARC tested in Trento: | |||
** Calibration stable. | |||
** Range measurements repeatable. | |||
** Full GUI control. | |||
* Fibre array prototype tested in Trento: | |||
** Analogue Hamamatsu photodiode arrays and driver circuits. | |||
** NI-driven DAQ. | |||
** Fibre arrays assembled in Italy with 500 micron scintillating fibres. | |||
** Repeatable, low noise measurements of beam position and profile at multiple positions and sizes. | |||
== QuARC Development == | |||
* | |||
==Scintillators and PD== | ==Scintillators and PD== | ||
* Scintillators uniform in thickness (3mm) and flatness. | * Scintillators uniform in thickness (3mm) and flatness. | ||
* Machine block clear polished sheets. | * Machine block clear polished sheets. |
Revision as of 19:46, 7 October 2025
Personnel
- UCL: Simon Jolly (SJ), Joseph Bateman (JB), Febian (F), Matt Warren (MW), Harry Barnett (HB).
- Bari (Ba): Raffaella Radogna (RR).
- Oxford University (Ox): Pete Hastings (PH), Mark Jones (MJ).
- Imperial College (IC): Andy Rose (AR), Duncan Parker (DP), Munir Saleh (MS).
- Heidelberg (He): Blake Leverington (BL), Julian Horn (JH).
Design Goals
- Real-time measurements of PBT beam range with sub-millimetre precision using plastic scintillator range telescope.
- Real-time measurement of PBT beam spot size/position with sub-millimetre precision using scintillating fibre arrays.
- Coverage of “clinically relevant” transverse scanning area and range:
- 230 MeV/330 mm range.
- 5 cm × 5 cm scanning area.
- Integration into single portable detector enclosure with single power and network inputs and nozzle mount.
- Full system control and display with web-based GUI from on-board DAQ.
Current Status (October 2025)
- QuARC tested in Trento:
- Calibration stable.
- Range measurements repeatable.
- Full GUI control.
- Fibre array prototype tested in Trento:
- Analogue Hamamatsu photodiode arrays and driver circuits.
- NI-driven DAQ.
- Fibre arrays assembled in Italy with 500 micron scintillating fibres.
- Repeatable, low noise measurements of beam position and profile at multiple positions and sizes.
QuARC Development
Scintillators and PD
- Scintillators uniform in thickness (3mm) and flatness.
- Machine block clear polished sheets.
- For 245 MeV, is it doable to do 1 module of 32 PD with the 2.8mm thick and then 3 modules of 32 PD with scintillators 3mm thick?
- For low energy just 1 module of 2.8mm
- Photodiodes are OK, there are no issues in the coupling.
DAQ & Electronics
Redesign of the analog circuit. The boards need a revision.
- We want everything to connect via usb-C (currently there is only one usb-C cable that does not work properly and it is a very long one). Did Saad discuss this with Marco? What was the outcome of the lab tests?
- We need all the power to come just from FPGA (5V, ~2A) ➾ the voltage regulator chips need to go.
- Long usb-C between the daugther board and the DDC will be removed, and the two can connect directly [daughter board - bridge usb C board - (usb C cable) - bridge board - DDC board]
- FPGA from Saad had some glitches that need to be resolved. Do we see those with Nexus as well as the usb104? ➾ On board fitting needs to be implemented
Calibration and data
Is it possible to calibrate the detector without a proton beam?
- Maybe an e- beam beta source?
- Modify the geant4 simulation to verify what E will we need so there is no quenching?
- Can we obtain average results to mitigate position sensitivity?
GUI
- Implement any options needed that have user input
- Replay and post-processing options
- Version with full live detector control ➾ reset and relaunch options included
- Check current varian control system: what does if offer and how do they control the detector? ➾ Check with Clatterbridge, Allison and A. Mazal
Mechanical design
- For 245 MeV, is it doable to do 1 module of 32 PD with the 2.8mm thick and then 3 modules of 32 PD with scintillators 3mm thick?
- How can we design the modules so they can attach and detach easily? ➾ We need a robust design but not rigid
- Power distribution?
- Beam windows? Light tight?
Future beam tests
- Beam test where we check the shape and position of the BP (scanning field)
- Real treatment plans
- Testing with real gantry mount