Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2021/06/16: Difference between revisions
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 16th June == === Present === '''Simon Jolly''', '''Saad Shaikh''' === Saad Shaikh === *") |
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== [[ELogs/SaadShaikh|Saad Shaikh]] === | === [[ELogs/SaadShaikh|Saad Shaikh]] === | ||
* | *Delivered [http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/pbt/wikiData/presentations/2021/SS210611_PART_edit.pptx seminar] for PART. | ||
**Laurent pointed out problem with error bars: forgot to divide errors by root(N). Error bars are actually very small, showing that background noise is periodic. | |||
**Laurent agreed to help with implementing improvements for ROOT fitting speed. | |||
*Labelling and re-measuring scintillator sheets that Simon has removed black paint from. | |||
*Optimised scintillator sheet pairings for 32 sheets: best combination is thickest/thinnest sheets. Gives average sheet thickness of 2.82mm. | |||
Latest revision as of 18:17, 8 August 2022
Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 16th June
Present
Simon Jolly, Saad Shaikh
Saad Shaikh
- Delivered seminar for PART.
- Laurent pointed out problem with error bars: forgot to divide errors by root(N). Error bars are actually very small, showing that background noise is periodic.
- Laurent agreed to help with implementing improvements for ROOT fitting speed.
- Labelling and re-measuring scintillator sheets that Simon has removed black paint from.
- Optimised scintillator sheet pairings for 32 sheets: best combination is thickest/thinnest sheets. Gives average sheet thickness of 2.82mm.