Difference: SusySubjet (18 vs. 19)

Revision 192006-08-10 - AreRaklev

Line: 1 to 1

META TOPICPARENT	name="JonButterworth"

Identifying massive hadronic decays in SUSY decay chains.

Line: 24 to 24

The SLHA file for John's \delta point has been generated with ISAJET 7.69, and SUSY decays added with SDecay 1.1. I checked the decays with the ones given by ISAJET and modulo small numerical differences they look the same. The file is attached. Also attached is the NLO cross sections for \delta as calculated with Prospino2.

Changed:

<
<

>
>

Plots for \delta have been produced and attached (NEW version as of 10.08.06). As a first attempt we are looking for events were two W have been produced in chargino decays. The decay chain we are looking for is ~q_L -> q + ~chargino_1 -> q + W + ~neutralino_1. For a ~q_L pair, either produced directly or from gluino decays, the total branching ration into a chargino pair is 42.1%, while the charginos decay to Ws in 97.5% of cases, making this a very common event.

A short description of the plots follow:

Top left: Plot of pT of jets. Cut on pT>15 and |\eta| < 2.5. In red is shown jets matched to a parton level W (by the usual distance \Delta R < 0.1).

Line: 35 to 35

Note that the three first plots have been normalized, and the cuts accumulated through the plots, which was not done in the first version. From the distributions of jet pT and mass, cuts look to be potentially very effective. However, in the log(pT*sqrt(y)) distribution the W-tagged jets have almost the same distribution as other jets, with only a slight excess just below log(pT*sqrt(y))=2. As a result the cut on separation scale is not very effective, and in the invariant mass distribution we see that while the signal plot (red) has roughly the expected endpoints, one can show analytically that for the \delta masses we should have 247 < m_{qW} < 1272, it is burried in SUSY background.

Changed:

<
<

As you can see there is no longer a top peak as in the first version, so this is no longer a problem. There are still too many background jets, and rather surprisingly the separation scale cut does not work very well. I

>
>

As you can see there is no longer a top peak in the invariant mass distribution as in the first version, so this is no longer a problem. There are still too many background jets, and rather surprisingly the separation scale cut does not work very well when you look at it after adding the other cuts. I am not sure that I understand fully why this is. One possible problem is that the higgs is another source of jets at this scale. Another is the large number of jets that have the same mass, of which a fraction should have a separation scale similar to the Ws. Also, very few leptons are produced at \delta, so I have no possibility to "guarantee" little jet activity in one chain, e.g. by looking for a chain that produces two leptons. Perhaps \delta is too difficult?

Changed:

<
<

We have discrimination between the W's and other jets as seen from the first three plots, but the invariant mass plot shows there are too many W candidates around after cuts. Note the a part of the problem is the copious production of top quarks in this model, which can be seen as peaks in the invariant mass plot. I'm still working on the numbers for how efficient the cuts are and how much of the problem is caused by the real W's produced in other decays, and how much is being faked by other jets.

>
>

One additional plot I made is a scatter plot of the separation \Delta R between the two quarks in the W decay and the pT of the W (also attached). I find this a little interesting because it shows at what sort of pT the quarks come out in the same direction, and can make a single W jet. Above 300-400 Gev seems to be good enough, but notice how few events are out there. This is reflected in the small fraction of Ws that decay hadronically that one can find a matching, single jet, for (less than one third with the \delta R cut given above). Perhaps there is simply too little boost for the Ws? I would like to know how this compares to the WW scattering situation.

I made another attempt by trying to find a Higgs in the decay chain ~q_L -> q + ~neutralino_2 -> q + h + ~neutralino_1, throught its decay to a bbbar pair. The conclusions are the same. While the jet pT and mass cuts work, the separation scale cut doesn't. You end up with the expected signal distribution, but with too much background. The relevant plots, following the same pattern as for the W is also attached. Here there might however be some more hope. No attempt at b-tagging the jet was made, which might give enought rejection on the background to see something.

Line: 48 to 50

delta.xsec: Cross sections at NLO for \delta calculated with Prospino2

Changed:

<
<

delta.ps: Som start-up plots for \delta

>
>

delta.ps: Some plots for \delta

META FILEATTACHMENT	attr="" autoattached="1" comment="Cross sections at NLO for \delta calculated with Prospino2" date="1153423812" name="delta.xsec" path="delta.xsec" size="10409" user="Main.AreRaklev" version=""
META FILEATTACHMENT	attr="" autoattached="1" comment="Som start-up plots for \delta" date="1155220073" name="delta.ps" path="delta.ps" size="29727" user="Main.AreRaklev" version=""

View topic | History: r39 < r38 < r37 < r36 | More topic actions...