Overall Group Performance.

 The group had serious communication and in some cases motivation
 problems. These were eventually circumvented at some level by a
 subset of the team effectively taking over, and a good level of
 achievement was subsequently attained. Nevertheless the rather
 slap-dash attitude to meeting attendance, minute taking and general
 monitoring of deadlines, goals and milestones meant that there was a
 delay in identifying and sorting out such problems and that large
 fractions of the group's potential were not realised.

 Overall mark:  B
 Individual marks: Assouali   B-
                   Cufflin    A-
		   Das	      A-
		   Eden	      A-
		   Neto	      B-
		   Rogers     B
		   Waterhouse B+ 

Report
 
 The group report was very professionally presented and well
 written. Unfortunately it lacked page numbering, making it very hard
 to refer to.

 Some specific comments: 

 Table1: electrons, muons and taus are incorrectly described as
 "neutrinos" instead of leptons.
 
 The cartoon quarks are great.

 Table2 - would be nice to have some indication of how well the masses
 are known. Certainly, they are given too precisely.

 Some table refs missing.

 Electron described as "more stable" than taus and muons. In fact it
 is completely stable...

 The interspersed questions are good on the whole.

 The Higgs Boson section - if there is a Higgs whose mass is GREATER than
 the mass of the Z, the LHC is the best hope of detecting it.

 Q8 of the questionaire has the wrong answer...

 A page in the SW section appears twice.

 Overall mark:  A-
 Individual marks: Assouali   C
                   Cufflin    A-
		   Das	      A-
		   Eden	      A-
		   Neto	      B-
		   Rogers     B+
		   Waterhouse A-