![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
Ping Bottleneck Results Purpose The goal of this experiment is to classify the the performance of the Boston Server machines used for the MB-NG project. It is hoped that the performance results obtained from these tests can be
Assumptions
Results Tests were performed from eth1 to eth1 on mbng2 to mbng3. They were connected via a cisco 7206 router with fifo queueing and no competing traffic. Excel file of results here. There were no packet losses during the experiment.
The minimum rtt shows a nice stable trend in the latency of the icmp echo/request as the size of the packet increases. The approximate minimum latency of these back to back tests was (theoretical 0 ip payload of 0 bytes) is about 0.005msec. The increase in latency of the b2b tests were about 0.063msec/byte. Note that these were at 100mbit to 100mbit. With the results from this test, the minimum latency was about 0.75msec (about 0.745msec more) and an increase of about 0.0018msec/byte. This increase in latency is assumed due to the fact that there is a 10mbit bottleneck in the path (no congestion). The results of the max and max rtts are not that meaningful, except for the fact that there appears to be a slight trend in the average rtt with increased packet size. Overall, these two graphs show that there is quite a large variation in the latency of packets even when they travel just through a cable.
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
© 2001-2003, Yee-Ting Li, email: ytl@hep.ucl.ac.uk,
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 1376, Fax: +44 (0) 20 7679 7145 Room D14, High Energy Particle Physics, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, UCL, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |