Using the WVCXME reweighting scheme the final fitted values for the CP-conserving couplings are:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Using the BILGOU reweighting scheme the final fitted values for the CP-conserving couplings are:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Using the BILGOU reweighting scheme the final fitted values for the CP-violating couplings are:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The plots for all these fits can be seen in figures 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
As mentioned earlier, the
is much more
sensitive to the CP-conserving couplings than the SDM
elements are. This means that the fit to
dominates the overall result.
However, for the CP-violating couplings the converse is true, the
distribution is much less sensitive to these couplings and therefore the fit
to the SDM elements dominates the overall results.
The goodness of the fit is given by the absolute value of the . The
calculated values of the
for the combined fit for each coupling is
given in table 7.2. For a good fit there should be a
of one
per degree of freedom.
The values calculated with the WVCXME give a lower
than BILGOU thus
suggesting a slightly better fit.