The diagonal elements of the two-particle joint spin density matrix, which have
and
sum up to unity, i.e. the matrix has normalisation:
This normalisation occurs because the diagonal elements are effectively the
probability of producing a pair of W bosons with helicity state
. The off-diagonal elements are complex, but the diagonal elements are
always purely
real. The matrix elements are functions of both the centre-of-mass energy
squared,
, and the W production angle,
. Examples of the analytical
predictions for the diagonal elements as a function of
can be seen in
figure 3.10.
![]() |
The two-particle joint density matrix is Hermitian and contains 81 elements. This means that, due to the normalisation given in equation 3.30, 80 of the elements are independent. However, if the W-pair production interaction is said to be CP-invariant, the helicity amplitudes fulfill the following relation:
A consequence of enforcing CP-invariance upon the reaction is to reduce the number of independent elements in the density matrix from 80 to 35. This is demonstrated in table 3.5, where the combinations of helicity amplitudes, and thus the SDM elements, that are equivalent due to CP-invariance are grouped into 36 sets.
![]() |
As the two-particle joint density matrix contains all the information about the polarisation of the W bosons, the 5-fold differential cross-section given in equation 3.27 can now be written in terms of the joint density matrix, equation 3.32.
The density matrix contains the probability of producing W-pairs of certain helicity
states so the differential polarised cross-sections for producing final states
of two transversely polarised W bosons (TT), two longitudinally polarised W
bosons (LL), a transversely polarised
boson with a longitudinally polarised polarised
boson (TL) and a transversely polarised
boson with a longitudinally polarised polarised
boson (LT) can be written in terms of the elements in the joint density matrix [41], as shown in
equation 3.33.
From figure 3.10 it can be seen that
, even in the presence of anomalous couplings3.4, so it intuitively follows that, as was stated earlier,
![]() |
(3.34) |